The general flow of the preceding 3 months was rough, to say the least. Losing 40 pounds in that short span of time was taxing on myself, my relationships and my responsibilities at work. It was difficult, but it was accomplished. So, here I’ll do a bit of a review of the process that took 3 months to go from 219 pounds to 178.5 pounds.
Firstly, two things helped me a great deal. My family and Sparkpeople. My wife was exceptionally patient with me from the beginning to the end. I think, in her own way, she knew she would benefit from a skinnier, healthier husband, but in order to do that, she had to have the patients to put up with my odd emotional outburst. Losing weight is a complicated biochemical process. It’s a path that necessitates blunt force through a delicate corridor. The hormones that regulate weight gain and weight loss also operate as neurotransmitters and work within complicated feedback mechanisms to produce feelings of hunger and satiation. All this means, quite roughly, is that weight fluctuations translate into dramatic mood swings. Insulin, for instance, is an immensely important and complicated player in the process and regulating it by adjusting the available glucose levels appears to have a more dramatic effect on weight loss than simply regulating calories.
I am thus advocating the “Atkins” method to produce rapid weight loss. Now does this necessarily indicate that the weight loss is due to the loss of fat? That answer appears to be yes. A conclusion which appears to be born out by more thorough analyses published in actual respectable journals of medical sciences. For one, from JAMA: (The article is available free to the public here.)
Weight loss was greater for women in the Atkins diet group compared with the other diet groups at 12 months, and mean 12-month weight loss was significantly different between the Atkins and Zone diets (P<.05). Mean 12-month weight loss was as follows: Atkins, –4.7 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], –6.3 to –3.1 kg), Zone, –1.6 kg (95% CI, –2.8 to –0.4 kg), LEARN, –2.6 kg (–3.8 to –1.3 kg), and Ornish, –2.2 kg (–3.6 to –0.8 kg). Weight loss was not statistically different among the Zone, LEARN, and Ornish groups. At 12 months, secondary outcomes for the Atkins group were comparable with or more favorable than the other diet groups.
An early study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, arguably the most elite journal of medical research agrees and found:
Seventy-nine subjects completed the six-month study. An analysis including all subjects, with the last observation carried forward for those who dropped out, showed that subjects on the low-carbohydrate diet lost more weight than those on the low-fat diet (mean [±SD], –5.8±8.6 kg vs. –1.9±4.2 kg; P=0.002) and had greater decreases in triglyceride levels (mean, –20±43 percent vs. –4±31 percent; P=0.001), irrespective of the use or nonuse of hypoglycemic or lipid-lowering medications. Insulin sensitivity, measured only in subjects without diabetes, also improved more among subjects on the low-carbohydrate diet (6±9 percent vs. –3±8 percent, P=0.01). The amount of weight lost (P<0.001) and assignment to the low-carbohydrate diet (P=0.01) were independent predictors of improvement in triglyceride levels and insulin sensitivity.
Theories as to why fat is used differently than sugar is a field in its infancy. A general review can be found here, though any notion in its infancy is always subject to question and being overturned.
The consensus opinion appears to be:
- Such diets result in greater weight loss compared to control groups
- They are effective and generally safe for periods examined over the course of 12 months
- No studies, that I am aware of have assessed their safety beyond 12 months
- It is safe to remain on the diet 7 days a week, all 12 months, if you have no preexisting medical conditions which would prohibit you from eating large quantities of proteins or fats.
First, let me show you the course of my weight loss:
Make your own decisions there. Two factors combined strongly indicate, to me at least, that after 14 days of nominal weight loss and a sudden rapid resumption of weight loss after switching diet is a good indicator to me that one diet works markedly differently than another. BUT the addition of Alli makes my own personal results questionable. Was it the Alli? Was it the diet? Was it both? My inclination is to believe it is a combination of the two. But, that’s only a small bit of the data. Here is the nutritional data:
The largest difference was in the total number of carbohydrates consumed - the amount of fat I ate as well as the total calories were roughly the same. But, again, that’s not all the data either.
This rather strange chart is the approximate calories I burned by doing a combination of swimming, running and elliptical. Clearly, starting at the month of march, I increased my work out significantly.
In the end, the raw conclusion is that a combination of diet and exercise is necessary to decrease weight. Not a very novel conclusion, I know, and (to make matters worse) there are too many complicating factors to suggest that any one single thing helped the most. Was it the switch to Atkins, the use of Alli or the sudden and extreme increase in cardiovascular exercise that contributed the most to the sudden resumption of rapid weight loss? I don’t know. But that’s the full expose of my secrets.
I also want to thank my father for generating a nice workout schedule, which I did put to good use. Because I injured my knee, I had to substitute swimming for the last four weeks in place of 20 minutes of cardio.




